Cloud Migration: Real-World Challenges, AI Costs, and the Move Back to Control
- ArcShift Team

- Oct 9
- 5 min read
Updated: Oct 13
For years, the public cloud was sold as the ultimate destination for performance, scalability, and security. The message was simple: “Move everything here, and your problems go away.”
But as workloads grow heavier, AI becomes mainstream, and regulations tighten, cracks are forming in that narrative. Costs spike. Performance dips. Security incidents rise. And CIOs who once proudly declared “cloud-first” are now quietly asking, “Do we need to rethink this?”
At ArcShift, we’ve seen both sides, companies go to the cloud and helping them come back out. The truth is nuanced: for small startups, cloud-first still makes sense. But for enterprises running data-heavy, AI-driven, or regulated workloads, public cloud is no longer the safe default it once was.
Let’s explore what’s really happening.

When the Cloud Isn’t as Safe or Cheap as Promised
1. Security: The Cloud Breach Problem
Cloud misconfigurations remain a leading cause of breaches. See: Why Cloud Misconfigurations Remain a Top Cause of Data Breaches Forbes Technology Council, April 8, 2025
Independent research tracks the same pattern: IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach 2025 shows rising costs and growing API/AI-driven incident vectors:
Tenable’s 2025 Cloud Security Risk Report highlights pervasive misconfigurations and exposed secrets across major providers:
In regulated industries like finance and healthcare, that’s a nightmare. The same elasticity that makes the cloud attractive also makes it easier to misconfigure.
Auditors don’t care if the vulnerability came from a managed service — the liability lands on you.
2. Performance: When “Infinite Scale” Meets Physical Reality
The cloud was supposed to eliminate performance headaches. But AI and data-intensive workloads have exposed the limits. Training large models in the cloud can cost 3–5× more than on dedicated hardware, simply due to compute pricing, I/O latency, and data egress.
We’ve seen companies spend millions on GPU instances — only to find that the same job runs faster and cheaper on rented colo racks with NVIDIA cards they actually own. The bottleneck isn’t always the hardware — it’s the unpredictable network layer, shared storage throughput, and throttled burst performance that hyperscalers rarely advertise.
Even “elastic” scaling isn’t free. When latency or cost optimization requires stable, localized workloads, the supposed advantages of hyperscale evaporate.
3. Cost: The AI Multiplier Effect
AI workloads are the new cloud cost explosion. Every inference call, every vector database query, every transient GPU hour adds up. One enterprise we consulted saw their monthly bill double after integrating a popular LLM API — without a single new customer.
And that’s before data egress. Once your data lives in S3, BigQuery, or Azure Blob, pulling it back out costs a fortune. Gartner estimates that up to 30% of cloud budgets in 2025 will go to egress and inter-region transfer fees alone.
Public cloud is still valuable — but it’s not the universally cheaper or safer choice it once seemed.

When Cloud Migration-First Still Makes Sense
Let’s be fair: if you’re a small startup, public cloud is still a gift.
You get managed services, global reach, and zero CapEx. You can prototype quickly, fail fast, and scale (temporarily) without infrastructure overhead. For teams with limited ops experience, there’s no better sandbox.
The issue is what happens after that first stage — when scale, compliance, and economics start to matter. That’s when companies realize the bill keeps climbing, and their workloads aren’t as portable as they thought.
So yes, cloud migration-first still works for startups. But cloud-forever doesn’t work for everyone.
Making On-Prem Feel Like the Cloud (Without the Baggage)
The biggest fear we hear from cloud-trained IT teams is, “We don’t know how to manage on-prem anymore.” That’s fair — most modern engineers grew up on AWS consoles, not SAN zoning.
Fortunately, the tools have caught up. Today, on-prem can feel just like the cloud — minus the unpredictable bills.
Private Cloud and Hybrid Platforms
OpenStack – Fully open-source IaaS with self-service provisioning and API control similar to AWS.
VMware Cloud Foundation / Tanzu – Modernized vSphere for containerized, automated workloads.
Azure Stack / Azure Arc – Extend Azure’s management plane into your own datacenter.
Red Hat OpenShift – Kubernetes-based hybrid platform used by major financials and governments.
Automation and Infrastructure as Code
Tools like Terraform, Ansible, and Pulumi give you cloud-style provisioning and repeatability.
CI/CD platforms like GitLab, Jenkins, and ArgoCD automate deployment across hybrid environments.
Security and Governance
CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management) and CASB tools now support multi-cloud + on-prem, giving one pane of glass for compliance and drift detection.
With these, your “on-prem” can operate like a private cloud. It’s familiar enough for cloud-native teams but gives you back control of data, latency, and cost.
Not Every Workload Can or Should Leave the Cloud
We’re pragmatic: some applications are born cloud-native and should stay there.
If your product depends on managed AI APIs, serverless functions, or a global CDN footprint, pulling it out would break the model. The same goes for SaaS integrations or tools like AWS Lambda, Google Vertex AI, or DynamoDB.
In these cases, hybrid architectures often make more sense — keep your front-end or AI logic in the cloud but move your heavy data, analytics, or archival layers back to infrastructure you control. The key is flexibility, not dogma.

ArcShift’s Approach: Tools and Methodology for Moving Out
When it’s time to reclaim control, ArcShift brings the methodology and tooling to make it happen without the chaos.
Our process and tooling focus on:
• Performance & Cost Modeling – Our in-house TCO cost modeler projects real-world storage, compute, and costs across public cloud, hybrid, and on-prem scenarios — exposing the break-even points that cloud calculators tend to hide.
• Discovery & Mapping – ArcShift’s internal assessment tools surface relationships between applications, databases, and storage systems to reveal what’s truly cloud-tied and what can move freely.
• Migration Planning & Data Movement – We design and validate migration plans that use incremental, resumable data transfer methods — combining vendor utilities with ArcShift’s custom automation scripts for throughput and verification.
• Post-Migration Validation & Optimization – Once workloads are repatriated or hybridized, our tooling verifies backup integrity, throughput baselines, and recovery workflows — ensuring nothing is left behind or misconfigured.
Our Cloud Repatriation Services help organizations move workloads intelligently — not just because of cost, but because of control, compliance, and performance.
The New Reality: Cloud Is a Choice, Not a Default
Public cloud isn’t dying. It’s maturing — and that means it’s no longer the universal answer to every workload.
AI, regulatory pressure, and economics are forcing a more honest conversation about where workloads belong. For some, that still means AWS, Azure or GCP. For others, it means a well-architected private or hybrid environment that performs better, costs less, and doesn’t leave you beholden to someone else’s throttle.
At ArcShift, we don’t sell infrastructure. We help you make it work — wherever it runs.
If you’re rethinking your cloud footprint or trying to understand what’s real vs. hype, talk to our team. We’ll help you map the landscape, quantify the tradeoffs, and take control again.




Comments